Whilst Sky are intent on portraying the English cricket team as pariahs entering a brave new era with their white ball team, they do have advertising slots to sell for the World Cup this year after all, many of us are not feeling quite the same bonhomie with this English cricket team. Chris’ review of the 2nd Test was as great as it was cuttingly brutal, quite simply this England team is the weakest team we have had in living memory and one that is arguably not fit for the Test arena. This is not a surprise to any of us as those who have followed the Test arena for a long time and we know that the spin that is trying to be spun by the powers that be are simply empty words from a clueless board and those that are in cahoots with them; words to try and dupe the public this is a but a mere blip and those in-power do know best. After all, who can forget the insightful words from our so-called Managing Director, that winning or losing doesn’t matter; it’s absolutely about attracting a new ‘audience to the game’
The England teams are very clear that part of their responsibility in playing this bold and brave cricket – this commitment to playing an exciting formula of cricket every time they go on the park – is linked to this. “Joe Root and [one-day and Twenty20 captain] Eoin Morgan understand their responsibility to be playing exciting cricket for future generations to connect with and for fans of the game to get behind us. It’s a very deliberate strategy. It doesn’t work every time you go out on the park. But we understand that it’s more likely you’re going to be forgiven for having a bad day if you’re doing everything to try to win a game, as opposed to not trying to lose it, which is a very key difference in positioning.”
So that’s that then. The whole art of playing Test Cricket, which has been successful for over 100 years has been deemed not good enough and then redesigned by a clown in an expensive suit who is desperate to embrace the whole hit and giggle side of cricket to make some more cash for himself. Get beaten by an innings, no worries it was an entertaining collapse. Play for the draw, I’m afraid Tom has said no way. This is the new and best ever approach to this format now as prescribed by the ECB. No wonder the England coaches seem even more confused and clueless than ever before.
I must admit that I watched very little of the 2nd Test as the result seemed to be beyond doubt after Day 1 when England once again hopelessly collapsed on a pitch doing something. I did turn on to see the late rites being issued by the West Indian bowlers but I admit I was more interested in the post match response than seeing another cravenly poor display from our batsmen and bowlers. Will they try to say it was a one-off incident though they did that last week? Will they admit that they are a poor team playing poor cricket (unlikely)? Will they call out Tom Harrison for being an incompetent idiot who shouldn’t be meddling in the Test Team (hopefully but not going to happen)? Or will they do what they always do and mutter something about working harder and a determination to turn it around in the next Test (of course that’s what they did). Joe Root’s speech was naturally non-committal but the reflections from Nasser & Mike Atherton were the ones that really did get me to giggle, especially when Nasser insightfully exclaimed:
There is a real problem in county cricket, where there is no real depth of top-quality, top-order batsmen. The red-ball game is being played predominantly in April and May, and then right at the end of the summer, on spicy pitches with a Duke’s ball.
“If anything, people are hiding away from batting in the top three. If you look at someone like Jason Roy, who some say is the next cab off the rank, he bats at five for Surrey. England have to go and see Surrey and Alec Stewart and say ‘we’re looking at him for the top of the order, can you get him up to three?’ Why would you want to move up to three in county cricket when it’s moving around? James Vince at Hampshire is slowly sliding down the order where it’s easier to bat.
I can’t have been the only one who laughed in slight disbelief that Nasser had only just grasped this now. Surely the succession of failed openers might have given it away? Or maybe the fact that most of the batsmen are averaging low 30’s with the bat? Or even the fact that England has been trying to cover their batting vulnerabilities by selecting as many all-rounders as they can possibly fit in the team? The fact that Nasser finally pointed out that there is an inherent weakness in our structure is something that most people with any knowledge of the red ball game have been banging on about for years and hardly puts his ‘insight’ in a good shade. We all know that the county cricket is something the ECB would very much like to get rid of, in fact if Test cricket didn’t make them so much money in London, they’d probably like to get rid of that too for some ridiculous bastardization of the game featuring beach balls and unicorns. What was particularly amusing about the interview is that he managed to say all of this without once suggesting that this is the fault of the ECB and Tom Harrison’s ‘let’s all have a slog, it doesn’t matter if we lose’ mentality. The reason why we struggle to find quality players in the county system these days is that access to the game is at an all time low, cricket remains hidden away from the public like some kind of deformed cousin and those that do make it to the county game are being forced to play red ball cricket out of season and are no longer given the time or coaching to hone their skills if they can’t hit the ball out of the park. So why is it again that we struggle to find quality Test batsmen Nasser? The answer is staring you in the face in the form of Tom Harrison and his rest of his not-so merry men, but then again they pay the bills of the Sky commentators, so naturally one can’t go and bite the hand that feeds you. Nasser though wasn’t quite done in making himself look like a prize turnip:
“We have a fundamental problem in England in that we are not producing top-quality number three batsmen. We are not producing a batsman who can play that innings that Darren Bravo played for Windies.”
Really Nasser, I guess that’s why they pay you the big bucks for insight like that and in other news the world is still round and the sun continues to heat the earth. One bonus from Nasser’s groundbreaking news though was that this did facilitate one of the best come backs on Twitter ever by a certain Nick Compton, which is worth dealing with the hassle of Twitter on its’ own:
Yes that man who was routinely vilified by our friends in the media (and sometimes Alastair Cook when he wanted to get rid of any heat after a poor series) as some kind of weirdo who didn’t fit in with the team nor fit the ethos of the English mentality. How dare he try and bat himself in when some mothers and kids might be watching? A word to the wise Nick, lose the defence and try and slog a quick bowler over cow corner, after all this is Tom’s new vision of English Test cricket. Now I’m not saying that Compton was the answer, but it would have been nice for the media to give him a chance, especially after a match winning knock in Durban second time around, before they decided that his card was marked and that he was ‘not one of us’. Not that this is the first or will be the last time that this has happened.
Mr Harrison mind you hadn’t finished making himself a laughing stock. In his interview with Ian Ward which was aired on Sky during the First Test and I do use interview in the loosest possible sense, Harrison managed to confuse and contradict his own statements in classic fashion. Mind you, Ward’s interview technique more resembled that of a craven apology and could only have been more accommodating if he had been fellating Harrison during the whole interview. I genuinely don’t know how anyone with even a remote sense of cricketing knowledge would have been able to stand there with a straight face when Harrison said:
We have got fantastic county competitions in this country, we’ve got a thriving international game, but what the ECB and I have to do is ensure we’re keeping an eye on the future and making sure we are doing as much as we can to make the game as open, available, and accessible as it can be to wider audiences. “There is plenty of evidence out there to suggest that while we have been doing very well with our county competitions, there is much more we can do to get those wider audiences in the game, which are going to be important in the future for this game to thrive throughout this country.
Sure that ‘fantastic’ county competition that you are trying your best to destroy, the one that has been pushed to the very margins of the game so that it is almost impossible for the counties to prepare players with the technique and skill set to thrive at Test Level. Ah yes, the county game that you and your associates are continue to take a knife to in the hope it finally keels over. It’s like praising an Olympic sprinter then sticking a bullet in both his knees, well he still has hands to stumble to the finish line on after all.
We also had the wonderfully timed piece by Ali Martin warning of the creation of Super Counties whilst England were thrashing away to another humiliating defeat – https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2019/feb/02/pca-hundred-super-counties. I genuinely am not too sure about which thing to be most worried about, firstly that Ali felt he needed to post a piece that was so stunningly obvious to most cricket and county fans or the fact that the PCA has only just woken up to this fact despite the huge red flags. Daryl Mitchell, who is the Chair of the PCA or as it’s known, the ECB’s subservient lapdog, explained:
“You run the risk of the game going towards eight super-counties and end up with a situation where it leads to player bias in terms of recruitment.”
Now what Daryl has said is completely correct, the franchises will no doubt hog their key franchise players to the detriment of other cricket going on concurrently; however my real concern is that the body who are supposed to represent the interests of all English players has only just realised that this competition will no doubt alienate those players who are not picked for the hundred and consequently make all other cricket going on at this time into a 2nd rate competition. Now I may be an old cynic, but surely this is not rocket science to anyone in or outside the current system. The rich will get rich, the poor will get poorer and those counties who are not identified as a ‘franchise’ will be left with a 2nd rate product that no-one wants to watch, all for the hope of a promised cash windfall of £1.3 million, which will likely get reduced when the Hundred flops horrendously. Certainly, it’s not enough to sell your soul and local team down the river for. The only way that the counties had a chance to stop this unwanted juggernaut then and to a lesser extent now was to stand together and reject the ECB’s model out of hand, yet the only 2 counties who decided to vote against the ECB’s blood money were the unlikely duo of Rod Bransgrove of Hampshire and my own beloved Middlesex. I may support Middlesex but even I wouldn’t trust the Middlesex board to boil an egg let alone lead the fight against the ECB especially as they are so thin skinned that they make Mike Selvey look like he is impervious to criticism. Even now, with the wolves at the door, many of the county chairmen are still convinced that sticking their head in the sand is the best way to approach this threat. Take the Chairman of Somerset, who by all means are extremely competently run county, but equally are the exact model that the ECB would like to rid itself of and his so-called thoughts on the upcoming challenges:
“Like it or not, some counties need the £1.3m a year,” Cornish was quoted as saying by the Somerset County Gazette of the money each club will receive once The Hundred is up and running.”
“We feel working with the ECB is the best way to drive growth in cricket. It is important to remember that it will be the Chairmen of the 18 First Class Counties who take the vote on the subject of the Hundred. “What matters more than anything is the future of the game as a whole. Getting young people to participate, and then nurturing that love of the game is what is key here.”
This is stupidity of another order, like having cattle walk voluntarily into the abattoir to be killed in the hope of receiving some greener grass just beforehand. Somerset are likely to be one of the major losers in this battle and their Chairman is rolling around hoping for his belly to be tickled by his paymasters? It’s quite frankly unbelievable. Once the Hundred is implemented, these counties won’t just be phased into feeder clubs for the so called Big 8, they will simply wound down until they no longer exist anymore. The ECB cares not for the county model especially in the red ball game, which is not making them enough money and doesn’t attract the right sort of cricket fan. All in all, this format is quite frankly an annoyance to the paymasters of English cricket even if the format still remains popular with many of the olders fans. What better ruse than to gradually make them as inaccessible as possible so they eventually are made redundant, so they can change the name of those counties who have a Test Match ground to the ‘Nottingham Ninja’s” or “North London Lions”. This is the new marketing game according to Harrison and his lackeys, after all who doesn’t want to a watch a game where there might be ninjas or lions in it? Talking of Somerset and people associated with the club, I have been an interested spectator following the posts of Andy Nash, who has turned from ex ECB Director and corporate man to social media pariah. Now there is no doubt that Andy is a very intelligent man and that many of his Twitter posts are absolutely spot on, but there is the cynic in me that asks:
- Why did you not do anything to fight this as a Director of the ECB?
- Why did Somerset vote for the additional short ball competition if you knew it would irrevocably damage the red ball competition?
Now there might be a very straight forward answer to this, but without knowing the background it seems more than a little hypocritical to take it upon yourself to act as the ‘mouthpiece for change’ even if what you are saying is correct, a bit like an armed robber lecturing a kid who has been caught stealing penny sweets. I have asked this question of Andy more than once on social media without response, so perhaps we can all gather together to ask him this the next time he tweets about the subject. Naturally Andy is very welcome to come onto this platform to share his views and experiences, but I won’t be holding my breath on this.
Of course, I could be missing the point entirely with this post. The English cricket team may resemble the worst team we have had in Test Cricket in living memory, the future for the majority of our domestic game and for the production of Test Players looks darker than it ever has been before and that the fans of the game have been relegated to nothing more than an occasional annoyance and not the right sort of consumer for their product, but all is good and healthy in the English camp. After all, a few pithy marketing campaigns and demanding that the players go out and have a slog (sorry play an aggressive brand of cricket) to keep little Gregory entertained is what our game really needs in the minds of the ECB.
Cricket is staring down the precipice, the only question is will those who have the power to drag it back from the edge, finally wake up before it’s all too late. I’m unfortunately not very hopeful.
To me it is the insulting of our intelligence, yet again, that miffs me.
Last year, when he was struggling with the counties, he called country cricket supporters “obsessive”. That, in no way, shape or form, a positive endorsement. It was one step away from calling them lunatics.
Nasser recently laid into older club cricketers, wanting to stay fit and socially active, saying they were blocking the youngsters, as if the only reason club and county cricket exists is to feed the international monster. I miss not playing, badly. Especially batting which is one of my favourite things to do ever.
But in his last pronouncements, someone has obviously said to Harrison that he’s gone too far, and he’s calling the county competitions fantastic, that it is such a great thing, that he loves that it is, but it’s not good enough because the kiddies know nothing about them. Oh, and mothers.
We’ve seen this ludicrous attempted rapprochement before. It never worked then, it won’t now. Because to point the finger back at them in the Outside Cricket press release (more of that later), we don’t TRUST them, we have reason to QUESTION their decison-making rationale, and as for ETHICS. Well, fool me once, more fool them. Fool me twice, more fool me.
Good work Sean,
LikeLiked by 1 person
Compton’s tweet is comedy gold, and so true. The very same guilty pundits who now demand batsman getting their head down were drumming him out of the team because he batted too slowly.
Shinny toy was a particular critic of his scoring rate. So too our new chief selector when he was just a humble commentator……as was Lovejoy, and even Bumble I remember moaning abut it.
It is funny how it is the usual united front of pundit doom for certain players. Almost exactly the same as what happened to Rashid.
Oh and I forgot to say I can just imagine Nasser, and Gooch, and Cook being delighted to have the ECB coming down to Chelmsford, and telling them were certain players should be batting in the Essex first team.
I know. As if counties should just bend to England’s will. And therefore the ECB. Who couldn’t give a fig for the counties.
What’s the point of playing as a youngster, if you’re expected to fuck off as soon as you get any good? It’s just moronic.
I see that Lord’s are selling day five Ashes tickets on a non-refundable basis, with the money going to charity if it finishes early.
They are very generous with other people’s money aren’t they?
How about I be allowed to decide if I want to give my money to charity, and The ECB concentrate on running cricket and setting sensible prices to encourage people to come on the fifth day?
Seeing as many test matches now don’t go behond day four it’s almost taking money on false pretences………Here’s their real pitch
“Pay now and you might see some cricket, but if you don’t we will give your money away to a charity of OUR choice.”
Once again, they really, really hate their customers.
Proof, if it were needed, that their ideal client is a corporate buying tickets for staff days out and easily able to afford the loss.
How much are they? At a tenner I can just see the point. Just. Though a rich club like they are can swallow that refund.
Any more and they are thieving bastards. Do they think punters should take the rain risk?
Would imagine they’re at least 20 quid, perhaps more because it’s the Ashes…
And we have to trust them to actually give ALL the money to charity. I wouldn’t put anything past these people. It just smacks of a way to avoid the administration of refunds.
Once again the fan/customer is treated like munchkins.
Just a thought, about attracting an audience and all those pesky youngsters not being interested in anything that lasts longer than 2 hours:
What about box-sets then?
In real life, I regularly talk to, and read comments from, viewers about TV dramas. Apart from actual children who may not be allowed, anyone under 35 is watching everything in blocks of 3, 4 and more 1 hour episodes. I frequently see comments from people who’ve taken a whole weekend out to watch an entire 22-part series. Older people are doing this too, tending to watch actual box sets on DVD rather than stream. People love being able to get immersed in another world. I’d say the audience out there now is more ready to watch a Test match than it was, say, 14 years ago…. when the nation was glued to the TV for the great Ashes series.
It’s all just excuses.
LikeLiked by 2 people
This. Total agreement. Twists and turns, immersion – it’s the in thing.
Home Ashes with close games and you’d get a big audience on FTA.
Will there be close games and a close series? You can’t guarantee it, but if you’re not on FTA when it comes, you miss the jackpot.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s the easy swerve from the ECB. A poor excuse to justify raking it in from their Sky TV deal…
There are a lot of myths around about why people supposedly won’t watch test cricket, or why channels supposedly won’t show it, and they’re all complete bollocks, invented by knaves and endlessly repeated by useful idiots.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Totally agree. It’s simply an excuse which is now repeated de facto..
If they ever put test cricket back on free to air channels it will be like when people saw Curling or archery in the Olympics. People will never have seen it before.
It will be like that….. “Mr Livingstone I presume?” …..moment.
Oh for fuck’s sake. How has he wangled this paid holiday?
Jesus christ. I thought this was going to be a quiet test. We shall now all be subject to the wisdom of Holt!
Just keep mentioning Eoin Morgan and his appalling piece of journalism. That’s what got me blocked at least 😀
Tweet from me liked by Andrew Miller.
His award is in the bag for another year. Bravo Andrew!
All he does is take photographs of all the places he’s been & then puts them on Twitter.
He’s not a journalist, more like Judith Chalmers. Wish you were here type.
Post cards from his holiday. What’s the point of him going now? It’s over, we lost. Was he at the Super Bowl last week?
This is a really, really good point. Netflix drop series in one go precisely because of binge watching.
What were Harrison’s qualifications for the job, beyond some experience of the sports rights market?