Did you think I’d leave it alone this year, just because I’ve been quiet recently? Of course not. When a key date like this, a key anniversary such as this comes along for this blog, then of course I’m going to commemorate. Just as we will with the two other anniversaries / birthdays this week. Why I do this can be summed up by a Tweet on Friday, when Pietersen said he was nor putting his name forward for the IPL. The suspicion being, certainly in the eyes of some of the media, that an Indian franchise would not part with big money for a player who hasn’t played a full IPL schedule since his sacking from the England team. So what? If KP thinks he’s not going to get a sufficient amount of money for two full months away then that is his decision.
The Indian fans on his twitter feed were generally very disappointed. The England fans on there were generally vindictive. Oh well. We knew that would happen.
We know the significance of the decision, still. That you placate mediocrity to put mavericks in their place. To announce a decision and still never say why you did it, treating the supporters with contempt. To see how the media reacted. It’s still too funny to watch the contortions, the sheer hatred that people have for him.
So, by way of a tribute, if it could be construed as such, I thought I’d share a part of a post I wrote some time ago. I intend, and still do, to go through each of his test hundreds, but I haven’t got the energy, time or desire to really do it at this time. But I had written a lot on the first one, and I give you now the draft thus far. It’s unfinished, it’s quite long, there’s still most of his innings to do, but there’s a ton about the build up to his 158. Hope you enjoy it.
Pietersen Century 01 – “The One That Saved A Dream”
I don’t think anyone who was an England cricket fan will truly forget that day. I don’t think you should either. There’s nothing quite like toppling a giant, and there’s nothing quite like doing it in style. That the style came from someone as un-English should not, and at the time, did not bother anyone. And by un-English I’m not going to get into qualification procedures, whether his mum being English was enough despite his background, but by the way Pietersen set out to save the game. It wasn’t English. You wanted to see English? Wait 18 months for Adelaide.
Four days earlier I’d had enough of Kevin Pietersen. Enough of the macho bullshit. Enough of the “it’s the way I play” stuff. Enough of the “mates with Warney” twaddle. I didn’t want my England players to be mates with the Aussies. Imagine Ponting having Pimms with Freddie? Of course not. Pietersen rang too many celeb sportsman alarm bells. So I did what I always did in these positions…. I took the piss. Pretended to my mates that he was the best thing since sliced bread. Did stupid pictures. Cooed at his very name. Sure, I loved what he did at Lord’s and Edgbaston but this seemed like a fire burning brightly, but for a short time. Graeme Hick made ODI hundreds. Never that great as a tesr player. I seriously doubted KP had it as a test batsman. When he lost his wicket to Warne on the first day, to another macho shot, I texted my mate Tom (who writes for the Offside Rule site) and we exchanged comments on how the bloke’s ego was way ahead of his production. In truth, it was a totally English response. It was bloody defeatist. That the only way to success, England style, was process. Play safe. Limit risk. At that time I wasn’t a risk assessor, and so hadn’t had my life complicated by weighing up those sorts of things.
But it is also odd how your memory plays tricks on you. I could have sworn when KP was out we were 80-odd for 4. We weren’t. We were 131 for 4, which although not great, wasn’t awful. I thought he was out for single figures. He wasn’t. It was 14. Again, not substantial but better than the 3 or 4 I thought he got. I think it is symptomatic of the way we remember things. Exaggerate the highs, depress the lows.
I was at The Oval for the first three days. I did some eccentric things prior to it, including hiding the tickets in a book in case we were burgled. Yes, I know. Dumb. Extenuating circumstances? Mum died two months before. I’m not sure my head was on straight for a couple of years after that. What was clear that I had about £1000 worth of tickets in my house for me and my mates, and they were worth a bloody fortune. I must have checked I had them all the way to London Bridge, when I could offload them on a mate. Or at least some of them. I’d seen Millwall in the FA Cup Semi-Final the year before and been nervous as hell. This was up there. This was, as every England fan knows, massive.
Those first three days left you constantly wondering if we were about to blow it. Yet again, the memory plays tricks. The opening stand was decent, and quite pacy, but I thought it ended in the 50s, not the 80s. Then I thought Ian Bell went straight away – none of us had any faith in Bell at this point – and he did. I seem to recall Vaughan at three played a really poor shot, and given Cricinfo’s update, he did. So KP’s demise at 131 had us all worried, with the high risk strategy that was Freddie at six, and Jones at seven. However, as he’d done all summer, Freddie played brilliantly, and at the other end, Andrew Strauss scored one of England’s greatest ever hundreds. It’s great because absolutely no-one talks about it, but without it we were dead.
There’s little sense in playing out the whole test in detail, because the story has been told. What I intend to do with the hundred is to put it into personal context, to go through the highlights I have and comment on what I’ve got, and add some of the perspectives in books and reports from the day. Distilling this isn’t going to be simple. I’ve been reading “Is It Cowardly To Pray For Rain”, which is the Guardian’s OBO reports on the series, and fills you with all the dread I get from some of this self-referential drivel, but, in its defence, it is a good reference point to judge mood swings.
Now I do remember my mate, who I secured tickets for and went to Australia with in 2002 (and South Africa the previous winter) had managed to secure one for that day. I’ve forgiven them both (the other mate, who got it, had known Sir Peter longer than me, and did great work getting tickets in 2006, so I forgive him!) and yet jealousy permeated my core that day. However, given my test record, my mate in Australia, Matt, was delighted that I wasn’t there, figuring we had more of a chance if I wasn’t (“you were at Lord’s.”…he said). I had to face up to following the action, knowing my brain would not allow me to concentrate on anything like work, in the office, on the internet, and sneaking up to the TV room for as many crafty looks as I could. It used to be if you smoked, you could nab quite long breaks. Coffee? No. You looked like a skiver.
As many of you will remember the state of the game coming into that day was “delicately poised”. A large chunk of time had been lost to bad light the previous day – play was starting at 10:30 in the last year of Channel 4’s contract and this test match started in early September, the 8th to be precise – so that the factor of overs remaining was pertinent and every ball, over, run survived drew the target further away from being accomplished. The 5th day was set fair, no real cloudiness, and England resumed on 34 for 1, having lost Strauss to Warne in the 4th over of the innings. This meant England resumed 40 in front after the Herculean bowling early on Day 4 had dragged the Aussie potential advantage back. England had made 373. Australia were 185 for 0, 264 for 1, 323 for 3, but Freddie did us proud. 367 all out. A lead, a precious lead of 6. Or potentially, a number of runs that could be scored from one ball.
The fact was 28 in front was nothing. Permutations suggested England needed to be batting until tea, at a minimum. Australia would go for pretty much anything. England needed to be scoring around 200-220 to give themselves a chance at a normal test rate of scoring. England’s approach had been positive, so we thought they might go on the attack a little. Australia had Shane Warne. We were, to be frank, effing terrified of him. By we, I meant the fans. I know I was……
Just remember how we felt at the start of that day. Just remember.
Happy Contempt for the Public Day.
Good article. Yes, we will always remember. No doubt that History will play out and another player will come along who will first be embraced like a god and then treated as shabbily. People don’t learn.
By the way it’s interesting to see the government getting involved in the FA debate and them not being fit for purpose. I wonder what they’d make of the ECB……
LikeLiked by 1 person
My local opened early that day, laid on bacon and black pudding butties (it’s a northern thing) for breakfast, and started serving at 11. From what I remember it was a long and rapturous day.
Would it happen nowadays? Not a hope in hell!!
Red sauce or brown sauce? 🙂
Always brown! 🙂
“The Indian fans on his twitter feed were generally very disappointed. The England fans on there were generally vindictive.”
The England fans have been well trained by the ECB media to not to think for themselves. Instead they take hook line a sinker every lie and false truth they are given. When the current captain is treated like the leader of North Korea it’s not surprising to see the morons follow suit.
They booed him at a 20/20 domestic final, encouraged with relish by the yellow media. They even said they wished he had never played in 2005 and we had lost. That is the kind of hate these people have for him.
And their hate will never die. its their badge of honour. These are the same muppets who genuinely believe that singing the national anthem louder will make all the difference. Talent is not important to these folks. Lemming like patriotism is all that counts. (Except of course when they say thy would rather England lost than KP ever played for England) These people are well drilled in hypocrisy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sod you Dmitri, now I’m going to have to watch the DVD (again) 🙂
Just learnt that Pietersen was “a decent player…. nothing spectacular”.
The things you discover on Guardian threads….
That’s quite mild for the knuckle draggers on there. They have been well drilled as to what to think. It’s been 3 years of constant propaganda by a dishonest anf free loading media has brought us to this.
Advertising works, Just look at David Beckham who is being revealed as a total fraud. Pumped up by the same media for decades. It’s a giant shit show folks!
I’ll never forget. Without that draw, where would we be?
LikeLiked by 1 person
We’d be taking the positives, still learning and building, building, building…. oh, hang on…
LikeLiked by 1 person
If only ICC had any principles… and where’s Clarke anyway?
Haigh on Benaud:
We are not worthy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The ICC deal is unravelling already as BCCI slams a 34% cut in its share of ICC revenues. Vows to make side deals with smaller member states.
“every other board stands to earn more than projected in the Big-Three model”.
How has Clarke managed to wangle it that England earn more again?
“the BCCI is unhappy at the lack of transparency in the calculations behind this new financial model”.
They kind of have a point here – although they were happy enough with the lack of transparency in 2014.
“the BCCI said it had wanted to defer the vote”.
Again I have some sympathy – it looks like this was rushed through trying to exploit the BCCI’s current shambles. That said, the current shambles is partly self-inflicted…..
“the 7-2 vote (Zimbabwe abstained; Sri Lanka joined the BCCI in the opposition)”
Don’t get me started on the SLCB…..
“In the past the BCCI has managed to maintain its grip over the ICC by having the Asian bloc on its side…. During an Asian Cricket Council (ACC) meeting, approaches are believed to have been made by the BCCI to the PCB but they were rebuffed”.
What goes around, comes around. I know the BCCI would have problems getting fixtures against Pakistan past their own government – but they haven’t exactly been trying. And they shouldn’t have made a promise they knew they couldn’t keep in 2014.
“But the BCCI remains confident it will be able to make its “huge clout” count by luring smaller members with more bilateral cricket outside the proposed Test league”.
No fears there, England and Australia have built up such a reservoir of good will among those smaller members, they will all be on-side. Oh….
(DOAG is on Netflix by the way – wonder if Selvey’s watched it yet?)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Only the three associate members on the ICC board have an equal vote.
Some blogger. 2 posts since last June.
2 more than Selfey, though. Where is that blog?
Best analysis of the ICC deal so far:
“the England hierarchy, impressed by Hales’ attitude and application in India”.
Bayliss and/or Farbrace continue to feed the Mail. I’m sure there’s no connection with the surprisingly easy ride the Mail has given them after the thrashing in India….
Attitude & application are the only criteria the modern England team care about. Ability, and skill is not seen as important. Blind loyal obedience to a cringing incompetent management is what is seen as important.
So one of your most skill full players is shown the door because he looked out of the window. Genius.
(If the direct link doesn’t work, try going in through his Twitter account).
There’s plenty that could be quoted, but let’s cut straight to his conclusion:
“The bottom line is this. Cricket takes up a huge amount of space and time, which 21st century people have not got. T20 and the Ashes will, in the long term, be the only things that survive. We can preserve the game’s diversity for a little while longer, but it will not be a simple process”.
He should re-name his magazine ‘The Uncricketer’ if he has so little belief in the game. Perhaps he should be put in charge of the Tour de France next – that takes “a huge amount of time and space” so it should probably be replaced by one of those arcade tabletop cycling games.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Much as it boils my piss to say this, but, he, at least, has grasped the FTA nettle, which is far more than any of his contemporarys have managed to do!!
Agreed – and his idea of giving away some free coverage as a ‘loss leader’ to the BBC is of course a good one.
I can’t remember what he’s written about FTA in the past – was he as egregious as Selvey about writing off any concerns?
I like the way he goes out of his way to stress that it was McLaurin who made the decision to abandon FTA for home Tests. This is of course true – but it also ignores that for six of the twelve years without FTA Clarke was in charge (and I haven’t got time to check it now but wasn’t there a crucial review in 2009 that Clarke spent a fortune to spike?)
Al of which is totally unconnected to ‘The Cricketer’ (or ‘T20 and Ashes News’ as it’ll have to be rebranded) getting an exclusive interview with Clarke where Simon Wilde asked feeble patsy questions that Clarke was able to swat away in his usual charmless style.
LikeLiked by 1 person
He is just confirming what I have been saying on here for years….Namely that the administrators are just managing the decline of the game.
He leaves out what I also say. Which is they are looting as much as they can out of the game to a small group of elites before it all falls apart.
Does the Ashes generate more money than say, Australia vs India? Or England vs India?
I watched the Sumday supplement this morning to see if David Beckham would get a mention. Just as I expected….. ex Man U and England football royalty is given a free pass. A cursory glance of some of the biggest brown noses of that particular francise are revealingly silent on the matter. Ollie Holt, Paul Hayward, the usual Man U brown noses are completely silent.
You would think Holt and his obsession with lecturing how certain sportsman should behave would have something to say. But no, they are all closing ranks behind their hero. Pathetic.
And yes this stuff was hacked…… but how else does any story and the truth get out these days in a world in which everything is protected by slick PR companies, and corporate bullshit? Do his corporate masters not understand the digital world? Have they not seen Snowden and wickkileaks?
So can you name the time and the place where you were when you first heard that this has finally happened?
Copy this to the Cook thread please!
Selvey gets interested in what’s going on in Dubai!
Hoult seems to be the only one of the English press corps who’s written anything about the ICC board meeting. The Guardian have at least a Reuters’ summary with enabled comments (a very rare event on governance issues from them).