Well, that wasn’t a bad old day, was it?
There are some things that are tiresome to keep repeating, yet repeat them we must. For yet again, a Test match went deep into the final session of the final, fifth day, and those who continually lobby for four day Tests should again be hiding their faces. They won’t of course – they stay completely silent on these occasions where their chosen affectation looks absurd. And nor is it any excuse to say the same applies in reverse to those who oppose shortening the game when it doesn’t go that far. It’s not remotely the same, for we all know that Tests can finish in short order sometimes, it’s that it removes the option when they don’t that is the objection.
Losing a day’s play to rain, as happened here, would have killed off a four day Test completely. All that we saw over the last two days wouldn’t have happened; Stuart Broad rattling through the West Indies batting, Ben Stokes launching himself into the role of opener in a way that Ed Smith dreamed of Jason Roy achieving. It wasn’t normal, no, but it was fun.
From the latter part of day four, it seemed inevitable that England would win the game, one way or another, not because of the overwhelming dominance of their position as much as the feeling that the West Indies were swimming against the tide. They were ragged in the field this morning, faced with a Stokes assault, but they’re not the first team to fall apart when being pummelled to all parts of the ground by a fully liberated batting order. If England’s plan was to leave themselves 85 overs to take ten wickets and dangle a slight carrot in front of the West Indies batsmen, it was slightly undermined by the pace of scoring that meant instead of a challenging but gettable 280 to win, it had become an extremely steep 312.
For a brief period in the West Indies 2nd innings when Brooks and Blackwood were together for a partnership of 120, there may have been thoughts of a truly special run-chase, but unless a team falls over completely, there’s usually a partnership in all doomed pursuits that raises hopes, only for them to be extinguished. It was little more than a mild consideration to note it needed to continue for another couple of hours for there to be any genuine prospect of an upset.
It’s not to say the West Indies batted especially badly, but England unquestionably bowled well enough when it mattered. It’s easy enough to fall into the trap of criticising England’s opponents as the justification for England’s victories, but it shouldn’t be a reason to forego the credit due to the likes of Stuart Broad – who had a point to prove, and did so – and Sam Curran, forever damned with faint praise by those who would focus more on what he can’t do than what he can. As for Stokes, he chimed in with key wickets to add to his runs in both innings. He’s England’s best batsman over the last year, England’s key slip catcher, and the bowler to whom they turn when nothing is going right. Inevitable comparisons to other all rounders in the global game can be ignored for the time being; for this England team he’s a special player, and possibly the only one who is truly feared for what he can do.
The teams will stay at Old Trafford for the Third Test beginning on Friday, which leaves some interesting selection decisions. Jason Holder’s post-match comments indicated that, if possible, the tourists would retain the same bowling attack, but England’s policy of rotation is going to come under considerable scrutiny. Stokes appeared to tweak a muscle at the conclusion of the Test, and while he’ll surely play purely as a batsman if not fit to bowl, it does change the team balance somewhat. If Bess as spinner is retained and England play with four rather than five bowlers, then Anderson, Archer, Wood, Broad, Woakes and Curran are all pushing for the three seam bowling places. Dropping Broad might add comedy value, given the likely explosion of rage following his performances this week, but it seems he is the one bowler who ought to be confident of retaining his place. Beyond that, there will be some extremely nervous bowlers.
We’ve had two fairly decent Tests, and we’re lucky enough to have a decider. There are flaws in both of these teams, but whatever the outcome of the series, the West Indies are in better shape on the field than they have been for some years. That it is a shadow of the great teams of yore is to ignore the progress they have made in terms of personnel and leadership. Their record overseas may be a poor one, but they’re being competitive in England. That is pleasing to see. Perhaps it is true that we are so delighted to see cricket, and Test cricket in particular, return that we may make allowances that in other circumstances wouldn’t be granted. So be it if that’s the case, there is time enough for that to revert to normal.