South Africa v England, 2nd Test, Day 3

One of the things I’ve found when writing match reports here is that it can get pretty difficult not repeating yourself after a while. This has certainly been the main issue I’ve had, with the repetitive nature of England’s problems with the bat. All of which made it an incredibly pleasant surprise to watch a day’s play without England’s top order collapsing in a heap and leaving Stokes, Pope, or Buttler with the job of rescuing the game.

The day began with England needing two wickets to clean up the South African tail, and Anderson did so within a few overs. This efficiency is also uncharacteristic of England’s recent performance, with opposition teams scoring just over fifty runs on average against them fpr the last three wickets in the past two years. This was hugely important in the context of the game, because it allowed England a first innings lead and meant that England’s top order wasn’t stuck in the field through the morning session waiting for their chance to bat.

When England did come out to bat this morning, something truly incredible happened: A competent Test batting performance from an England batting unit. Honestly, it was simply a better version of the first innings performance. The batsmen all got starts, but Dom Sibley applied himself and got a well-deserved 85*. When Crawley and Denly did lose their wickets, an Englandbattingcollapse didn’t immediately follow. It was not the most hostile conditions for batting, and the bowling seemed quite tame at times, but England’s batting has been so chaotic in recent years that this seems like definite progress.

A particular point of improvement over England’s past batting has been their performance against South Africa’s spinner Maharaj. Whilst not hitting him out of the attack, England’s batsmen did manage to keep the scoreboard ticking over when they were facing him and have yet to gift him a wicket in this innings.

With the recent proposals by the ICC to change the default format of Tests to four days, I’ve seen the argument made that today’s play would support that idea. A day with few wickets and little drama does nothing to make Test cricket more attractive and profitable around the world, some people have suggested. There is certainly something to this point of view. We’ve all seen flat pitches leading to boring draws which sap the will to live of anyone unfortunate to be watching.

The thing I like most about Test cricket, when compared to ODIs and T20s, is the lack of artificiality. More often than not, the better team in the conditions wins a Test match. Great bowlers are allowed to bowl as many overs as they are able, and place their fielders with few restrictions. Batsmen can typically bat to the farthest limits of their abilities, both mental and physical, rather than swinging wildly at a few deliveries and calling it a day. Allrounders can demonstrate their skills in both phases of the game to the fullest extent. Everyone bats, in every game.

England have been by far the better side in this game, in particular with their bowling which has been able to extract bounce and movement from this pitch. Therefore, it seems absolutely fair to me that they should be able to put themselves in a virtually unassailable position with this innings if they are able to. If this Test were shortened to four days, then they would be not be able to fully establish a winning position due to time pressure and would either have to declare early on day 4 or risk gifting South Africa an undeserved draw. This would not seem fair to me.

On the topic of four day Tests, there were another 4 overs lost from today’s play due to the bowling teams’ lethargy. On a day where South Africa’s spinner bowled almost 30 overs. If you think international teams will be able and willing to consistently bowl 98 overs in a day, then I’ve got a Nigerian uncle who want to get in touch with you about an exciting business opportunity…

Comments on the game, four day Tests, or anything else are welcome below.


8 thoughts on “South Africa v England, 2nd Test, Day 3

  1. man in a barrel Jan 5, 2020 / 5:39 pm

    In the world of horse racing, there would be a Stewards’ Enquiry


  2. Mark Jan 5, 2020 / 8:12 pm

    I would say this test match is a warning of the folly of four day test cricket. Each side have batted aprox 1 day per innings. Neither team have scored big in their first innings, and yet if this was a four day match we would have a day left to force a result despite neither side scoring 300.

    England would have to declare sometime before lunch time and then hope they can bowl out SA in about 70 overs. Really?

    Unless you produce result wickets there are going to be a lot of draws in Shinny toys new utopian future.

    Liked by 1 person

    • quebecer Jan 5, 2020 / 10:57 pm

      It would be ironic if Sibley really makes it in tests only to get dropped because of a switch to four days.


  3. Grenville Jan 6, 2020 / 10:20 am

    It’s a good job for Sibley that Cook has retired. He’d be for the drop after an innings like this one.


  4. dlpthomas Jan 6, 2020 / 10:35 am

    157 for the session and a lead of over 400. Amazing.


  5. dArthez Jan 6, 2020 / 2:03 pm

    Elgar did not last the required 300 balls, 1-1.


  6. thebogfather Jan 6, 2020 / 3:07 pm

    ECB/Sky XI are going to fuck this up, aren’t they?
    …and then for once, they’ll really be able to blame the bowlers, so they can officially drop one or two
    Next text is a slow road so they’ll bring in a not fully fit Archer and a never fully fit Wood…



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s