4 February 2014. Chinbrook Road bus-stop. The news came through. England were sacking Kevin Pietersen. It had been trailed. It had been hinted. It had been whispered. The behind the scenes briefing. The hints, the allegations, the rumoured bust-ups, the spurious rumours, the aftermath of a tour that will live in infamy. The world leading team falling apart at the seams, and to make sure the ruins were complete, the decision was to sack the top run scorer on the tour.
Let me take you back to the How Did We Lose In Adelaide post (to those new(ish) on here, this was my (Dmitri) site before Being Outside Cricket). My reaction was initially meant only as a diary entry, expecting only my friends to read it. And they did at first. Then it caught on, and then it got attention, and linked, and more attention and before I knew it, I had a “thing” going. But the post on the day of the sacking is worth re-reading (the old blog still exists out there, but is password protected).
What The Hell Are We Thinking?
It was a rainy night. I’d had a pretty asthmatic couple of days and was wending my way home. The commute was as lousy as usual. The trains were packed as the Tube strike beckoned. I saw a tweet from Mike Selvey of the Guardian saying a decision on KP was expected within an hour. I then tried to access BBC sport, Cricinfo et al on my crowded train. That tweet was well over an hour old. The news was out, and so I wanted it confirmed. You don’t prep a news story like that unless it’s the controversial outcome on the way. But my smartphone wasn’t playing ball. No internet. Nada.
I got off the train at my stop and still no joy. I rebooted it and walked out towards my bus stop. It was raining, I was wheezing. I got to the stop, got under cover and switched on BBC Sport. KP had been sacked. “You are having a laugh” I exhorted.
And that’s how I will remember it. Where I was, the date (Trevor’s birthday) and the poxy weather.
Since that announcement much has been said and written. I’ve been prolific on Twitter, which is where you can catch my ill conceived views on a more regular basis. So you know the following:
- This is an idiotic decision.
- If there is an excuse for this idiotic decision, no-one seems to know it
- If there is an excuse for this idiotic decision, no-one seems to know it, why aren’t we being told, as paying punters, why our best batsman, and he is, despite people saying Cook or Bell is, being excluded.
- Has he breached his contract – well, evidently not as they are supposedly settling it.
- Someone has been talking out of school, because Pringle, Hoult and Selvey in particular have been privy to some information and Paul Newman of the Mail has been calling for KP to be dropped since January.
- I have never been convinced that sacking your best player is a recipe for future success.
- The cricket authorities have treated the public with barely-concealed contempt. Did they expect a pat on the back for this stupidity?
- The meme that we should wait until we know more before we pass judgment is an insult to all our intelligence. Iain O’Brien, the former New Zealand bowler re-tweeted Alan Tyer’s response to that.
- The awkward squad of ex-pros are united, almost, in their agreement. Boycott has been vociferous, in an example of such craven hypocrisy I’ve failed to see equaled. A man who never voluntarily left any team at the end of his career other than to benefit himself, saying KP should go for “daft shots” or whatever. Lord. Willis chimed in, and what respect for him I had went out of the window. Tufnell on 5 Live seemed to agree, another treated abominably by the suits in power. Only Aspergers [Ian Botham] has come out with all guns blazing from an England perspective.
- No-one, but no-one, is asking for KP to be liked by his comrades. Michael Clarke was openly despised by a number of his team-mates, got stuffed 4-0 in his first full series on the road in 2013, and yet now is a hero and I never, ever, heard the Aussies call for him to be dropped.
- Brian Lara was always a solo impresario in a team, and was actively undermining the captain at times. But, he went out on his own terms. While they had some success without him, who could deny he wasn’t deserving of a place?
- Australian teams famously never got on that well off the field. Warne despised Buchanan, his team manager, yet was never seriously in the frame to be dropped.
This is a country where a quality player was left out of a team because the selectors adhered to a view “what does he bring to the table, except runs?” That was Graham Thorpe. We’re idiots.
There will be more, much more. But read utter fuckwittery like this and then ask yourself, is this a case of the toff tendency in the officer class putting the riff raff infantry in their place? It contains absolute up your own arse shite like this…
As every sensible medieval king figured out, the way to deal with a rival king in exile is to govern well at home. Then the appeals of the exile’s advocates fall on deaf ears.
I’ll translate that for you out there. You plebs will soon forget KP when those new charges come in and score all those runs that he might have. Why you have to put it into some sort of highfalutin old keg-meg like this, only Ed “I’m really very clever, just ask me” Smith knows. But then, it’s his kind of people making the decision.
This Tweet made me smile…
This will be yesterday’s chip paper soon enough. That was proved by the Twitter Top Trends in London an hour later:
We look at the team we are sending to Bangladesh for the World T20s and the ODIs in West Indies and we see someone like Jade Dernbach rewarded for perennial failure (and a massive gob when we lose), and yet somehow our team ethic is enhanced by him and not KP?
There’s a lot more, I know, and I will be commenting soon. Take this as my opening gambit. I’m not impressed.
I always commemorate this date, as I do Outside Cricket Day (the 9th), because the fact is that the attitudes surrounding this decision are still as relevant today as they were then. You don’t think so? Look at the media strategy, the interaction with punters, the paying heed to the paying customer that Tom Harrison has when talking about the Hundred. You don’t matter. You don’t have the right to an open dialogue. You don’t have a veto on my decision making. You don’t have to be consulted. You sit there, you pay your ticket prices, you pay your subscriptions, you sit down, you shut up. You are the means to me, Tom, getting paid. You are not entitled to be in the loop. You are not MY STRATEGIC PARTNER.
Yes, I know KP would probably be on board with some new T20 competition. That really isn’t the point. This site has not, and never will be, a KP Fan Site for all he does, for all he did, for all he entertained me and many others. Did I love him as a batsman? Well of course I did – but I’m not judging his opinions on the game, like some have always wanted me to do in their vainglorious search to justify what was done by Downton, Clarke, Cook and Flower back five years ago. While all we have had to say to the form issue is that he still scored the most runs for England on that tour – a terribly inconvenient FACT no matter how badly we performed – it has had to be something else.
At the time he was in our best XI, and we picked on something other than that. That we weren’t told may be all fine with idiots like Ed Smith (as linked in the article above – the link in bold), but the one thing he did say that was correct is that we’d be ok with the decision if we found a great replacement. We are still looking. What we have now is a load of flotsam, threatening good stuff, while producing fitfully. Remember how Whitaker latched on to a few centuries by Ballance as if he’d found “the one”. Just as they latched on to that, they clung to the raft of Cook’s captaincy as it collapsed in a heap as we lost at home to Sri Lanka, all to help themselves be convinced about the dropping of KP. Let me put it this way, there was no shortage of information and ammunition for How Did We Lose In Adelaide to write about.
As evidenced by wrote another piece in the immediate aftermath..
That’s what is getting to the general England cricket supporting public. The latest dispatches from Mike Selvey and Muppet Pringle are lacking in any journalistic insight at all. Selvey rambles on about a blank canvas and Cook’s steely determination, as if we should not really bother ourselves with what happened, but be excited about what is about to take place. Selvey gives the game away in this paragraph:
In addition, how will he be considered by the cricket-watching public who, deprived for whatever reason of information, see only the ECB outmanoeuvred in terms of public relations by Pietersen’s acolytes and sympathisers. In this, a distraction as it may be from the main debate, Cook through no fault of his own has been done no favours.
The cricket-watching public, conservatively, are 70% in the KP camp judging by retorts on Twitter and comments pages on newspaper sites. They haven’t waited for ECB statements, nor have they been influenced by these so-called “acolytes and sympathisers” as if such a pejorative term is appropriate for Piers Morgan and a neatly timed interjection or two by the people operating KP’s Twitter and Facebook feeds (or KP’s wife, who tore Dominic Cork a new arsehole).
There’s more excusing of Cook:
This, though, is genuinely the start of a new era. Cook may have been Test captain for 18 months but it has largely been Andrew Strauss’s team he has been leading.
Rubbish. The reason Australia were so successful in that golden era was because it didn’t really matter who captained them. Captaincy was a seamless transition from Border to Taylor to Waugh to Ponting. All four were very different captains in style and substance, but all kept their team on a winning trajectory until the top players retired. There were no “blank canvases”. There were no “Border Teams” or “Waugh Teams”. It’s a red herring. What is important to note here is how certain players regressed alarmingly over the past two years, and how even our best batsmen lost what they had in 2009-2012 – the big hundred. That’s not as a result of this being “Strauss’s Team”.
Now Cook is charged with the responsibility of helping to rebuild the Test team, if not in his image, then according to his strategies and ethos. He, and the team director, have a blank canvas with which to work, the process already starting perhaps with the decision of Eoin Morgan to withdraw from the Indian Premier League auction.
He’s been running this team for 18 months, and if he hasn’t input his strategies and ethos already, then he is not the man for the job. Pure and simple. This is puff pastry journalism. Plus, aren’t you all thrilled about Eoin Morgan replacing KP in the test team. That’s going to work. (Filed under, we’ve tried that already).
This all builds up to Selvey’s conclusion:
That Cook is a cricketer of the highest calibre brooks no argument. Nor does the fact that he is as mentally strong as any who have taken the field for England. The challenge in Australia was the first to which he failed to rise either as batsman or leader. He has been learning and, while cricket education never ceases, he cannot hide behind that any longer. Cook held up well in Australia in spite of everything thrown at him. He is held in the highest esteem by those left, respected both as a single-minded, driven player and as an individual, the most important elements.
I said when he was appointed captain, with the same lack of captaincy experience that is totally held against Ian Bell, that we may live to regret this, as Cook was young enough to be given the captaincy later in his career, that all England captain’s batting seems to fall off a cliff when under pressure, and that we were risking a prize asset with a career already littered with some real losses of form. As much as this is hindsight, I’d have given the captaincy to Graeme Swann. Selvey’s piece is hokum. Cook mentally disintegrated with ridiculous dismissals – if this was holding up well, the bar was set incredibly low. His batting certainly didn’t making it 10 Ashes test without a ton. His captaincy, by general consensus, was poor. He showed extreme lack of faith in players (a trait he shares with another dour opener to captain his country, Mike Atherton). As for the held in high esteem comment, we only have Selvey’s word for that. The amount deserting the sinking ship seem to indicate otherwise. Do you think Panesar, and most criminally, Steven Finn hold Cook in high regard?
So if we move on from Selvey, to the laugh that is Muppet Pringle, the PR man for the Essex Mafia (Marlon Brando (Gooch), Al Pacino (Flower), Robert DeNiro (Cook)) who has come down off his party weekend to give his backing to the Chelmsford Cosa Nostra.
Alastair Cook has been widely criticised for being too meek in the face of Australia’s onslaught this winter but once the England and Wales Cricket Board confirmed it wanted him to continue as captain he responded by making the most ruthless decision of his career.
Who said Cook made a decison, had an input or whatever? Someone been telling Muppet things out of school? It’s Cook who pulled the trigger, eh?
Cook is unworldly despite his travelling the globe these past nine years so he may not have considered the potential effect his decision to deselect Kevin Pietersen will have on his popularity as captain. If a poll conducted by Sky Sports this week was accurate, an overwhelming majority (88 per cent) felt it was wrong that Pietersen should have his contract terminated, an execution Cook had the power to stay.
Once Flower had shown his hand, as he did, indiscreetly in January (don’t you just laugh at the inference that KP is a serial leaker breaching the trust of the inner sanctum – ho ho ho) reported by Paul Newman which seems very true to life now, Cook was in no position to say he wanted him if he wanted to keep his job. Flower may have been moved from Team Director role, but he still has clout. Gooch still has clout. Pringle seems to know a lot about this process. One wonders how….
Others will have baulked at the prospect at facing the boo boys who will inevitably greet him next summer, but Cook is so steeped in his belief of the primacy of the team that he would not have considered his personal wellbeing for one moment.
He might look like a wide-eyed innocent but Cook is tough. You do not score more than 8,000 Test runs as an opener without being able to cope with brickbats and bouncers. With his faithful team-mates beside him he should be fine.
A few digs at KP without the courage to say he isn’t a team man. The last line seems to indicate an individual leading a team who need to bolster him up. Isn’t it the other way around. How can these faithful teammates help when they fear speaking out against him, or playing their natural game to the chagrin of automatons like Gooch, and make everything fine. Are you really saying, Pringle, that KP brought this team to its knees? Really?
The best antidote to any woe in sport is winning and England have managed that before without Pietersen. Indeed, the batsman in possession of the highest average in England victories over the past 10 years is not the departing swank but Ian Bell.
They call this stat-mining. Please don’t take this as an anti-Ian Bell rant, but I’ll wager there’s a lot of narrowing of any gap in these averages when you take into account their contrasting records against Bangladesh, who we’ve beaten every time. Bell averages 158 against them, KP 68. Someone re-evaluate this after taking that nonsense out of the equation. And, again not belittling Bell, but there was always that stat attributed to him that he never scored a ton unless someone else did in an innings for quite a time. In addition, we rarely won tests when Collingwood got a ton. Anyone having a pop at him, while we’re at it? Garbage stat. Mumbai and Colombo just passed Pringle by, didn’t they?
Whether or not you agree with Cook’s decision to end Pietersen’s association with England it remains a courageous one even if he did not speak to him during the fateful meeting in London that decided the latter’s future eight days ago.
How you contradict yourself in the space of one sentence. Sack someone by press release. Really courageous.
While not against the outcome…..,
Understatement of the century.
….my only dispute is whether England’s captain was thinking clearly when he made his conclusions. Cook had been back home less than a week when the meeting was held. Emotions from a tour in which Australia pounded England in all forms of the game would have still been raw. Far better, surely, for him to have taken his decision after a month’s rest on his farm. That way he would have at least known that head and not heart had made it.
One, you aren’t a player in this. At least I hope you are not. So your dispute should be irrelevant. Also timing forced people’s hands with two squads to be announced, so Cook wasn’t master of his own destiny even if this codswallop is to be believed. Third, Cook really is getting a free pass for all he did wrong on this tour, isn’t he?
It is a gamble by Cook. Australia was his first Test series defeat as captain but the feeble nature of the loss means this will be his final chance to make his leadership work. To take it on without your best batsman, albeit one who appears in decline, shows that he prizes team unity more than individual brilliance, though that does tend to be the English way.
Why is KP the only one deemed to be surplus requirements AND in decline. Who the hell performed on that tour? Anyone sacking Prior (not that I want that to happen) and Anderson? What about the regression of Root, is he in decline? Ian Bell had a poor series, is he on the way out? And what about the captain himself. Ten Ashes tests with no hint of a hundred. Is he over the hill. No, KP is in decline. And is Cook not responsible for the feeble nature of the loss in any way? His supposed treatment of Compton without giving him the chance to open against Australia? What about his captaincy when Australia were chasing 200-odd to win which had seasoned captains despairing at how he treated his bowlers and field placings? How about how we got the top boys out, but could never kill off the lower order? What more evidence do you need? Scoring runs, and even winning against the relative pop-gun test attacks he’ll face this year is no proof he’s the man to lead us into the challenging 2015 series, with lots of tough teams to play. England used to be desperately hard to beat. We’ve lost that.
Even so, Cook must still have felt betrayed by Pietsersen, especially after he had been the one who had pushed hardest for his reintegration following the messaging scandal with South Africa in 2012.
He’s been leaked something, but ain’t telling. This is pissing everyone off. The comments to this article say it all. There’s no smoking gun but there’s talk of betrayal. His reintegration should not have meant that KP should be mute, grateful for forgiveness. His big ton in Mumbai did all the talking. Without that, we may go 2-0 down. You can thank him later.
Pietersen repaid his new captain’s faith then with a brilliant innings in Mumbai but not this winter in Australia where a combination of soft dismissals on the pitch and hard words off it against the leadership trio of Cook, Andy Flower and Matt Prior, were considered destabilising.
So his dissent is the key here. Blind obedience. You owe me one. All nonsense. Like all should be sweetness and light when you’re being humped 4-0 on the way to an embarrassing 5-0 defeat. Did this not happen on Cook, Flower and Prior’s watch?
This is where a more worldy man than Cook might have sorted it out.
Flight not fight is not the sign of a good leader. And Pringle goes on about dressing room enforcers as if physical battles are all that matter. If I’m KP, where I’ve been rightly destroyed after what I did in Perth, and played like I did in Melbourne to see my supposedly morally superior teammates balls it right up, and not get the level of abuse KP did, I think I’d blow a gasket and I defy any human to think otherwise.
The proliferation of coaches and management in modern teams means that players have become used to seeking solutions to their problems from others and not themselves. In the past, the team member with the biggest muscles would have pinned Pietersen up against the nearest wall and told him to behave. It used to be surprisingly effective and nearly every team possessed such an enforcer.
No-one ever accuses KP of not working hard on his game, and often he needs to seek solutions from others, as does Cook with Gooch, for technical issues. I really haven’t got a scooby what this idiot is on about other than that. You wanted someone to hit him? Cook hardly held the moral high ground, and nor did Flower, after their abomination of a tour.
It is too late now and perhaps such a direct fix would not have worked on Pietersen anyway. His departure has meant the creation of a vacancy, one Eoin Morgan is eyeing following his withdrawal from the Indian Premier League auction which begins on Wednesday.
There is a neat irony about Morgan’s decision. Morgan knows, as Pietersen once did, that Tests are the format where legacies are made.
This sickens me – the phrase “as Pietersen once did”. It seems to go from Cook got rid of KP to KP wanted to go to play in the IPL. Jesus. How clear has he been that he wanted to play for England, get to 10000 runs, score a ton in South Africa. How clear? Yet you throw out the “he wanted the IPL money”. Morgan, who chose to play in the IPL rather than fight for a test place, that is done something KP NEVER did, is held up now as a moral beacon. This is odious stuff.
The comments are magnificent. Not that the likes of Selvey and Pringle care a jot. They, and Agnew, all get really uppity when they are called Embedded at the ECB, or not journalists. By their action should they be judged. Be a journalist and tell us the whole story, not “we know more than you, and you have to believe us when we say the ECB is right”. That’s just not washing at the moment with the public, the ex-players and those outside the loop.
More to follow, especially on the ECB and their hideously ridiculous excoriating of KP for breaching the inner sanctum.
I said on Twitter last night that I don’t want to fight the war before last, and I mean that. But there are always battles to fight which have their gestation in the treatment of others. England, and its cricket in general faces a crisis of focus. In its prioritisation of this year’s World Cup, it is in danger of rendering test cricket a poor second party. It is diminishing the county championship – sticking it to the margins, then blaming it when it doesn’t produce the oven ready players. And then, on top of that, it wants another trinket, gazing in envy as it did at the Big Bash, and wanting that, here, in August. Instead of just that, they had to try to be too clever. We are now just over one year away from it, and we are all pretty much none the wiser. It’s a deliberate strategy, and yet outside of some vociferous noises on Twitter, the odd broadsheet broadside, it’s all quiet. All of this is a symptom of how we were treated over KP’s sacking. I hope the useful idiots at the time, who put their hatred of KP over the sheer vileness of the decision and what it meant, and who now loathe the Hundred realise we are on their side, and always have been.
The 4th of February should be a significant day. We might call it KP Sacking Day, but it should really be ECB Think We Are Worthless Day. Because that is what it meant. KP wasn’t the illness, he was the symptom. And we have not, by any stretch of the imagination been cured. We had the supine media doing the bidding. We had them use people’s animus towards a player to justify their own malfeasance. We saw who was on the cricket-public’s side, not the ECB’s side. We got to know more about the class-ridden, snobbery inherent in the game. We got to know ECB’s mouthpieces.
For me as a blogger, it was the launchpad. I often look back at those times as the glory days, but they really weren’t. They were hard graft, at a difficult time, and the blog was a vent for my anger. Five years on and I’m, sort of, still here. We have a great blog, maybe not quite up to the levels of anger from that time, but still definitely capable. To those who have supported me along the way, thanks.
And thank you.
(I knew you wouldn’t be able to resist another commemoration)
For those who missed out on HDLWIA, here’s where disillusionment with the “embedded press” really peaked, about eight months later:
Outside Cricket Day to come soon too!
On the upside of it all, it did at least bring us all together.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Goodness – this takes me back. I can only keep quoting Dylan: I used to care, but things have changed.
PS – has anybody seen clivejw around – his last post in the Graun was April 2018….
Nothing on Twitter from him either 😦
LikeLiked by 1 person
Unfortunately the useful idiots or paid lackeys couldn’t or wouldn’t see the real significance of the KP sacking, and its wider implications for the game. . It marked the end of the England cricket world that most of us had grown up with.
A world in which there were clear demarcation lines between the governing body, and the media holding them to account. The media let their hatred of KP cloud their judgement, and abandoned their role as ECB watchdogs to become cheerleaders.
So all these years later, and this latest WI debacle is the icing on the cake of bad policy supported by the useful idiots . That old question….. “What did you do in the war daddy?” Is answered by most modern English cricket journalists by saying ….”We helped the enemy within.”
LikeLiked by 2 people
Probably repeating myself but I gave up the “news”papers a long time ago. They used to be the prime source of information but the Internet made them redundant. Realising that any information they printed was old news by the time they hit the streets (not just sport but everything), they changed tack and started printing opinion, predictions, controversy and even made up stories. Why should I pay money for that? I can form opinions unaided and have no respect for Selvey, Pringle nor Newman (who he?).
I do have respect for the team here and over on TFT, principally because everyone is honest.
I thought it was quite funny when papers like The Guardian created comments sections. They assumed, smugly as it turned out that everyone would agree with their oh so clever wise words.
Turned out many commenters knew far more than the so called journalists. So instead they started censoring like a communist state media.
Below the line now means only agreeing with what is written, It’s become pointless.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Not so sure about that. The Guardian in the “Lord Selvey” era was a repository for smug self-congratulation and back slapping for ages. It still is for a fair few writers there like Barney Ronay. The Telegraph cricket pages were more a raging hotbed of anger at the
journalists (Pringle especially), and none of the genuflecting that was pretty constant in the Guardian.
But I agree they didn’t expect what happened, it’s just that I always felt Selvey was rather hurt that after all those years of people telling him how wonderful he was, now suddenly people were asking pointed questions or (God help us) disagreeing.
But that is my point legglance. In the Selvey era it was as you say full of smug ,self congratulation and back slapping comments. Anyone who didn’t agree got banned or removed.
There were many on here who had their post taken down on the Guardian site. The whole below the line idea became pointless. There were rumours of certain journalists censoring the posts that made them look ridiculous.
I agree with you about the Telegraph. Bizarrely for an establishment paper it became the comments board of criticism of the ECB. The Guardian and the BBC turned into ECB Pravda.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Fair enough Mark, I wasn’t on there that much, I thought you meant that there wasn’t any disagreement.
I can vouch for this, at least on cricket. It all changed in August 2012, when they dropped him after Headingley and the texts.
It changed very, very quickly indeed. Previously respected posters barely changed their tone but were pigeonholed as troublemakers by BTL acolytes and staff alike, simply for treating the narrative with scepticism.
The man in question simply doubled down, of course. What else can you do when Cook is an alumnus of your son’s school, Flower is your mate, Strauss plays for Middlesex, KP is a “cunt”, you played with Downton for years and you go to Giles Clarke’s parties?
The proof of the pudding wasn’t even Pietersen. It was the Big 3 reporting in 2014, and then 2015 when he did Clarke’s retirement press, repeatedly pilloried Graves, reported the “redemption” Ashes like a belligerent fan and ignored Death of a Gentleman completely.
I still think we were right in 2012.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Interestingly, for the Telegraph it was the incessant snidey anti-Pietersen stuff from Pringle that set everyone off. Each article was followed by people slating him for having such a transparent agenda. To their credit, they never shut down any of that debate or criticism, apart from the properly abusive (fair enough there) and there were obviously developing differences of opinion between the staff writers too – particularly Jonathan Liew and Nick Hoult.
While I really went at the media in those days, my ire is still at the arrogance of the ECB that they thought they could get away with it with no repercussions. They seriously underestimated the backlash. Sure, they can sit here now and say they brazened it out, but at what cost?
Many of those journos are now unemployed, retired, or seriously demoted. Any pleasure in that? Absolutely not. But what they didn’t get at the time is that passionate people can write passionate stuff. They hid behind KP’s PR machine, when all he had to do was keep quiet, and let the ECB shoot themselves in the foot.
It still angers me that the greatest England batsman in my lifetime had his career ended by a ECB official who was sacked within a year for being totally useless (and the media may want to re-write history, but the uselessness was highlighted by this blogger before I saw anyone from the press tell me he was crap). A giant taken down by a microbe. England cricket – old school tie let loose.
Our press is slightly better these days, but not by a lot.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Resonate with anyone?
Interesting about the premier league viewing figures. As someone pointed out there are a lot of people watching in pubs that are not included in the figures. However, there is a smallish audience for all pay for view sport.
It’s profitable for the governing bodies, and the players and their agents. But I wonder if it will be good for the sports long term. I’m thinking I will probably go on subscribing through the summer for the Ashes, and then I will jack it in for the start of next seasons football season. I’m just not watching that many games anymore. It’s a waste of money.
@LCL’s comment above. Word for word, that’s how I feel and why. The only thing I would add is that they didn’t just brazen it out. They actually succeeded in poisoning many people’s views on Pietersen. Whether it’s those perhaps less capable of independent thought or looking through the BS it doesn’t matter. There are now a significant number of people who believe he was a shitbag and wish he’d never played for England. That too must not be forgotten. It disgusts me to this day.
Those that had been poisoned were given legitimacy beyond comprehension. If I had a pound for each of the self declared neutrals being the drippers of such poison, I wouldn’t be blogging. This wasn’t a neutral issue. You either let the ECB get away with it or you backed them.
And we warned of the consequences. Harrison is just a house trained, neatly pressed, buzzword Giles Clarke.
Don’t start me on Harrison. He’s a “shall I undo one button or two” man. His Sky interview would’ve triggered a greater response from me a few yrs ago but they’re welcome to the bed they are making.
Agree with your “given legitimacy” point.
It just depresses me that there is a bunch of cricket fans who think Pietersen IS an arsehole because they were told it was the case.
Anyway, thanks for the post. I enjoyed it. Thanks too Non-Ox – enjoyed re-reading that commments section (I came late and gave up!). Currently on:
“I read this twice. Then I went away and did something, just to make sure that I wasn’t in some sort of parallel universe, or a dream. Then read it again.
This article is unbelievable…l
You thank us for supporting you along the way.I don’t know what I would have done not being able to read your comments and support for KP and vent my anger. He has always been my cricket hero and I was so angry, frustrated and upset at the way they treated him.I had met him a number of times and couldn’t understand how people were saying such terrible things about him.He is a lovely man. Couldn’t understand why certain players felt as they did about him.Jealousy perhaps. He seemed to have everything. Beautiful wife, son, comfortably off and such a great batsman. We were the real losers not being able to watch him batting for another 3 or 4 years. He has followed a new pathway and I think he is far happier now than towards the last of his cricket career.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I second Julie to say a big thank you for helping us keep our sanity over the last 5 years. You’ve remained honest, unlike the numerous ‘gaslighters’ (a new word I learned recently) amongst the newspaper cricket correspondents.
BOC is only 4 years old. Well nearly.
I appreciate the nice words.