Hey Rainmaker, Come Away From That Man – 2nd Test, Day 3

Dmitri here, as a late stand-in to write today’s little piece. And for once, I promise it will be short!

England started the day in an awkward position, but the theory was/is that England would have the best of the batting conditions on Day 3. With Rory Burns and Joe Root, who had built a decent partnership at Old Trafford back in September against the Aussies, at the crease, it was clear that a lot of responsibility was on their shoulders. They started quite fluently, and Burns reached 50 first as Wagner tested whether he could play the short ball or not (he could, and when he middled it, the ball fairly flew to the boundary). Joe Root was much more circumspect, cutting out some of the more risky shots in his repertoire, but relying more on the the nudges and flicks.

At lunch, and with me flicking back and forth between this and the Iron Bowl (War Eagle!), I decided, after an hour failing to get to sleep, to stay up until Rory Burns made his century, or fail trying. Post-lunch the play was very sedate – good for England to get some time at the crease, play proper test cricket and get a sound base, but not wonderful if you are actually trying to win the game (and I believe that ship sailed once New Zealand passed 300).

The pace slowed, England facing the bowling dry ethic, some funky field settings and some thoughtful, if not penetrating bowling, and had to remain patient. Burns had some release shots, most notably when he seemed a little stuck on 94, when he got a nice wide gift, and then a few balls later he made it to his second ton with a flick off the hips. I said before this test that Rory is a AAAA player in baseball parlance, and I still think he is to a degree. But what he is at the moment is the best opener in England, so he’s certain of his place for a while now.

A brain fart did for him, just as Athers was commenting that this was a time for a big ton, Burns pushed for two, wasn’t the quickest on the first run, and was one frame short for the return. Having survived almost being sawn off by Joe Root earlier (Matt Henry missing the throw in from the outfield), it seemed a particularly careless dismissal. One suspects that this innings will turn out to be more important to Rory than it will be for England.

Joe Root got stuck in, didn’t give it away, accumulated and made a confidence building hundred. While I am most worried about the captaincy’s effect on Joe Root’s average, and production for the team, this doesn’t answer the questions about his ability to lead in the field that are getting louder and louder. This was a vital innings, and to be very fair, Root has tons in his last three overseas tours, so he’s not failing to produce away from home. But again, the innings also was one that didn’t advance the game in any way, and probably betrayed the lack of confidence he might have in this team. It would look a good innings if we were trying to save the series. In terms of winning it, it maybe wasn’t the best policy. For our long term future, it might be the most valuable for the team. Cricket is funny like that.

Root made his slowest century in terms of balls faced (I’m getting a Matthew Hayden at the Oval vibe) but he’s still there, and while he is, England can contemplate getting up to New Zealand’s total. The dimissals of Stokes, who nicked to first slip after a fluent cameo, and Crawley, who might have blown his one chance for a while by nicking off to Wagner for 1, set England back. Ollie Pope came in and stabilised the innings with Root to take England to 269 for 5 – 106 behind but with a chance, if only a slim one – before the remainder of the day was rained off. The forecast isn’t crash hot for the rest of the game either. All pointers are for a second successive 1-0 win for New Zealand in a two test series. This pitch is a slow pudding, and it’s hard to see England bowling New Zealand out with time to chase down a winning total.

Thought for the day(s) – Doesn’t the way Warner has got nearly 500 runs, for once out, in two digs on flat Aussie wickets with the Kookaburra ball speak absolute volumes for the quality of some test cricket. Pakistan will enjoy it in England, if we put up the same conditions as we have in the past few years. It’s mad. Also, Yasir Shah made a test hundred. The game is in a pretty old shape, ain’t it?

Comments on Day 4 below.

10 thoughts on “Hey Rainmaker, Come Away From That Man – 2nd Test, Day 3

  1. Metatone Dec 1, 2019 / 6:00 pm

    I don’t have the figures to hand but I’ve been wondering for a while if the Kookaburra production line has changed and not for the better from a bowler’s point of view…

    Like

    • dArthez Dec 1, 2019 / 7:15 pm

      Last year around the same time Australia lost a series at home to India (1-2, with India looking good in the last Test for a win as well, if the weather had not played spoilsport on Day 5). Admittedly, Australia missed some batting, but the Indian batting was good enough to cope with the Aussie pace attack. Pakistan have not even looked close to compete with either ball or bat.

      I don’t think many people go around and blame the Duke ball when tourists to England struggle to bowl high quality swing either.

      Like

  2. Benny Dec 1, 2019 / 8:59 pm

    I’m feeling philosophical tonight. Two of the most dreadful starters in an England cap were Gooch and Gatting. I wouldn’t write off Sibley, Pope or Crawley too quickly. I feel less generous to those have had many chances but can’t score a ton every now and then

    Like

  3. dArthez Dec 2, 2019 / 5:33 am

    England’s day, but it is probably a little too late. Even if the weather forecast was not iffy, you would expect New Zealand to be able to bat 65-70 overs tomorrow as they still have 8 wickets in tact, on a pitch that is not deteriorating that much.

    Think Root is also resigned to that, since it appears we are one over short, and if he had bowled himself for one, or maybe two overs we would have had enough time to get another in (or a wicket),.

    Like

    • dlpthomas Dec 2, 2019 / 7:18 am

      England have looked a lot better this test. Pity its only a 2 test series.

      Like

  4. dlpthomas Dec 2, 2019 / 7:19 am

    I think Raval’s LBW has put an end to the theory that the batsman always knows when he has hit it.

    Like

    • dlpthomas Dec 2, 2019 / 12:28 pm

      Its disturbing stuff.

      The following quote is worth storing away just in case:
      “Cricket reporters are among the most mollycoddled in journalism. They are usually accommodated in air-conditioned comfort, afforded the best view, and given free wifi, food and drink. And the price for all that is that they have to force themselves to write about a game they and their readers find enthralling. It’s so much better than a real job.”

      Like

  5. Benny Dec 2, 2019 / 12:49 pm

    Actually remembered to turn on the TV last night. Interesting words from Athers: “Root is one of the top four England batsmen I’ve seen. The others are Gooch, Gower and Pietersen.”

    Like

    • nonoxcol Dec 3, 2019 / 8:08 am

      They’re certainly the three best I’ve seen (post-1981). I hesitate to include Root purely because I’ve seen so little of his Test career, which overlapped with my Sky subscription for only 14 months.

      Like

Leave a comment